School Project
Why Modelo Wins
Mining 4,000+ consumer reviews to decode America's #1 beer

What an eye-tracking study revealed about which Febreze ad consumers actually see
Febreze had two very different ad creatives in the wild for the same Ocean & Wind product. Version A leaned into shock — a moldy wheel of cheese on a turquoise background, paired with a dense block of text claiming bad odor makes memories harder to form. Version B took the opposite approach — a sunny beach scene with the bottle nestled into the sand, palm fronds overhead, and a clean three-word slogan: "Refresh Your Space."
The marketing question was simple to ask and very hard to answer with a focus group: which one actually works on the human eye? We set out to measure attention, not opinion, and to give Febreze an empirical answer about what to put on the next poster.
We ran an eye-tracking study on female respondents — the brand's primary audience — in a controlled environment. Each participant viewed both versions while a Tobii-style tracker recorded fixation count, dwell time, saccade amplitude, peak velocity, and time to first fixation across four pre-defined Areas of Interest: logo, product, slogan, and the dominant emotional element.
We exported AOI metrics and dropped them into SPSS for marginal-means analysis, then layered a fourteen-question post-study survey to capture slogan recall, scent recall, emotional reaction, and purchase intent. The eyes tell you what the brain looked at, and the survey tells you what the brain remembered.
The numbers told a clear story. Version A's moldy cheese hijacked attention — 5,804 ms of dwell time and 24.3 fixations on the cheese alone — but the actual product bottle barely got 305 ms of first fixation, and the slogan was misremembered by most respondents.
The finding that reframed everything: Disgust grabs attention — Version A held the eye longer on cheese than Version B held the eye on anything. But what people remembered, what they felt, and what they were willing to buy all flipped in Version B's favor.
Use fewer elements per ad so attention has somewhere to land. Cap slogans at three words because longer copy is glanced at, not read. Anchor the emotional trigger in something positive — beaches, flowers, fresh air — not repulsion, because disgust attracts the eye but repels the wallet. Place the Area of Interest hierarchy intentionally, with product and slogan competing for the prime quadrants instead of the logo. Make the product visual larger and add motion cues that lead the eye toward the brand mark.
Eye-tracking is one of the only tools that can show the gap between attention and persuasion clearly, and once you have seen it, you stop trusting creative meetings that argue from instinct alone. Every ad I work on now I think about as a sequence of glances, not a single image.
Tools used